Your case may be very compelling, and it may be backed up by a clean and valid legal process with clear evidence, but all of that may not be enough to guarantee that Google will. remove links to defamatory content. If Google has already denied you in recent months, you can continue to periodically Shadow Making ask Google to reconsider and try to provide any material it can to demonstrate that you have followed proper processes and have established that harmful material should not be Shadow Making allowed to stay. If you have not yet been sued for a court order for defamatory content, you should realize that your chances of success may be limited at this time if the content is posted on a site that will stubbornly refuse to delete it.
Person making Shadow Making the post, so you may need to go back to court to get a subpoena for the ISP that manages the IP address associated with the content creator. You discover the person associated with the IP address and then take them to court to establish that they have wronged you with false statements. Once you get an injunction to stop them from continuing to defame you, and a court order that the things they posted were false and defamatory, you pass it on to websites and Google and ask them to Shadow Making remove these elements. Some websites are outside the jurisdiction of the United States and simply ignore you. Other sites, like Ripoff Report, choose to do nothing because US law does not require it. And Google can decide whether or not to remove the URLs.
Owner's wife were defamed by a disgruntled investor who hid their identities and published websites, YouTube videos, and a Ripoff report. Lawyers for the injured parties found out who posted the information by obtaining the Shadow Making person's IP address, then sued the defamer and obtained a court order. When the removal request was first submitted, Google denied it without any explanation. Then, when resubmitted, Google Shadow Making asked for additional evidence to prove that the defendant had been properly notified, which was done in person via a court process server.